Personality and borrowing behavior

An examination of the role of need for material resources and need for arousal traits on household’s borrowing decisions

Authors

  • Atefeh Yazdanparast Assistant Professor of Marketing, Mead Johnson Endowed Chair in Business, University of Evansville, Schroeder Family School of Business Administration
  • Yasser Alhenawib Associate Professor of Finance, Director of the Institute of Banking and Finance, University of Evansville, Schroeder Family School of Business Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i1.3296

Keywords:

Personality, Household finance, Financial decision, Borrowing attitude, Borrowing intention

Abstract

This research is an empirical examination of the role of psychological characteristics of household decision makers in their borrowing decisions. Using a unique household survey data that ties together relevant concepts from the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) and psychological and attitudinal literature, we obtain direct measures of each surveyed household’s personality scores, relevant attitudes, and financial profiles. Following regression analysis, we examine the relationship between attitude towards borrowing and intentions to apply for specific borrowing options and inspect the role of personality traits in such decisions. Specifically, we focus on tow personality traits, the need for material resources and the need for arousal, which have been largely ignored in extant household finance literature. Our findings indicate that the attitude toward borrowing and the intention to borrow are not always consistent and, more interestingly, the discrepancies between the two vary across personalities, highlighting the role of personality traits in borrowing decisions. Specifically, while the positive relationship between attitude towards borrowing and intention to borrow is intuitive, we show that this relationship is trivial for individuals who score low on need for material resources and individuals with low degrees of need for arousal. In contrast, for individuals with higher levels of need for material resources and need for arousal, the positive association between attitude towards borrowing and the intention to borrow is significantly intensified. Further, our results suggest that borrowing options are not homogenous and are motivated differently. Consistent with the view that individuals with greater need for material resources consider quantity and quality of possessions as the criteria to judge personal success, we find that these individuals have stronger intentions for mort- gages, home improvement loans, business loans, personal loans, and payday loans. Similarly, consistent with the view that individuals with greater need for arousal favor stimulation and excitement that is often associated with more spending, we find that the borrowing decisions of these individual are marked with stronger intentions for home improvement loans, business loans, student loans, personal loans, and payday loans. The intentions for credits cards and automotive loans seem to be independent from the borrower’s personality. Finally, we report strong evidence that personal attitu- dinal biases towards money, risk, financial planning, and borrowing as well as certain demographic characteristics influence household’s borrowing behavior. Our work contributes to the literature on household finance in several ways. First, we focus on two under-researched personality traits to examine their roles in household borrowing decisions. Second, this research recognizes the distinction between the attitude towards borrowing and the intention to borrow and examines the inconsistencies between them. Third, we consider a wide spectrum of borrowing options that differ in terms of risk, motivation, and loan maturity.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Yazdanparast, A., & Alhenawib, Y. (2017). Personality and borrowing behavior: An examination of the role of need for material resources and need for arousal traits on household’s borrowing decisions. Financial Services Review, 26(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i1.3296

Issue

Section

New Original Submission