Does financial risk tolerance change over time?

A test of the role macroeconomic, biopsychosocial and environmental, and social support factors play in shaping changes in risk attitudes

Authors

  • Stephen Kuzniak Department of Financial Planning, Housing and Consumer Economics, University of Georgia
  • John Grable Department of Financial Planning, Housing and Consumer Economics, University of Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3370

Keywords:

Change in risk tolerance, Social support, Macroeconomic indicators, Financial risk tolerance

Abstract

Financial planners work in an environment that requires the documentation of a client’s financial attitudes and preferences. Financial risk tolerance is one such attitudinal construct that is generally required by regulators to be evaluated. While there are numerous commercial and academic products used to assess client risk attitudes, questions have been raised over the past several decades regarding the stability of scores from risk-tolerance tools. Specifically, financial planners, as well as regulators, require evidence documenting to what extent risk tolerance changes over time, and if changes do occur, the variables associated with variability. The purpose of this study was to address these needs. Based on a model that included macroeconomic indicators, biopsychosocial and environmental factors, and measures of social support, it was determined that risk-tolerance attitudes remain generally stable over time. However, there are groups of test takers that exhibit significant shifts in risk tolerance. This article describes some of the variables associated with these score changes, as well as providing financial planning professionals with guidance on how to identify clients who may be prone to shifting their tolerance for financial risk.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-30

How to Cite

Kuzniak, S., & Grable, J. (2017). Does financial risk tolerance change over time? A test of the role macroeconomic, biopsychosocial and environmental, and social support factors play in shaping changes in risk attitudes. Financial Services Review, 26(4), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3370

Issue

Section

New Original Submission