Equity Fund Size and Growth

Implications for Performance and Selection

Authors

  • Conrad S. Ciccotello 2354 Fairchild Wve Suite 6H-94, Department of Management, United States Air Force Academy, CO 80840-5701.
  • C. Terry Grant School of Professional Accountancy, University of Southern Mississippi, 730 East Beach Blvd., Long Beach, MS 39560.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(96)90023-2

Abstract

Should individuals choose the largest or smallest equity jimisfor investment? This study explores the relationship of equityfind size to pe$ormance. Historical returns of largejiouis are found to be superior to their smaller peers. Yesterday’s best peforming funds tend to become to&y’s largestjkds as individuals invest heavily in response to the communications about the fund’s past success. But thefindings suggest that, once large, equity jimak do not outperform their peers. Especially for jima!s in aggressive growth objectives, the advantages of being small appear to outweigh the disadvantages. For individual investors wtih aggressive growth objectives, a strategy of investing in smallerjiouis may thus be wealth maximizing.

Downloads

Published

1996-06-30

How to Cite

Ciccotello, C. S., & Grant, C. T. (1996). Equity Fund Size and Growth: Implications for Performance and Selection. Financial Services Review, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(96)90023-2

Issue

Section

New Original Submission