Short Selling and Trading Abuses on Nasdaq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(97)90030-5Abstract
We examine the potential for short-selling trading abuses unique to Nasdaq during a period when there was no up-tick rule and no effective prohibitions against "naked" shortselling. Wefindthat(a)shortsellersearnedsignificantabnormalreturnsonNas- daq securities, but these were smaller than on NYSF_/AMEX securities; (b) they did not destabilize markets by selling intofalling markets and exacerbating price drops; and (c) Nasdaq short sellers may be more susceptible than NYSE/AMEX shorts to "short squeezes." Our results cast doubt on the appropriateness of recent regulatory reforms establishedfor Nasdaq and public concern over Nasdaq short-selling abuses.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1997 JAI Press Inc.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restriction.
Author(s) grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. Reusers must acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
In addition, FSR grants to the UGA Libraries a worldwide, non-exclusive license to all content published by the Journal, including metadata, that is necessary to publish, transmit, and index the Journal and to preserve its content over time.