An Analysis of Nondeductible IRA Contributions and Roth IRA Conversions

Authors

  • Stephen M. Horan School of Business, St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, New York 14778
  • Jeffrey H. Peterson School of Business, St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, New York 14778
  • Robert McLeod Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0224

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(97)90003-2

Abstract

On average investors have an income replacement rate of 64% of their pre-retirement income, which in many cases results in a lower tax rate in retirement. We analyze the impact of declining withdrawal tax rates on the choice between taxable mutual fund investments and nondeductible IRAs. The relative attractiveness of the taxable mutual fund option declines significantly when withdrawal tax rates decline. Converting existing IRAs to Roth IRAs is generally beneficial for investors who remain in the same tax bracket upon withdrawal. For short (long) time horizons and low (high) expected returns, the marginal value of conversion in I998 is greater (less) than the marginal value of optimal conversion. For investors dropping into the 15% tax bracket, conversion is generally not beneficial unless the conversion is done optimally, the time horizon is long, and the expected return is high. Investors in the 15% tax bracket should convert existing IRA assets.

Downloads

Published

1997-12-30

How to Cite

Horan, S. M., Peterson, J. H., & McLeod, R. (1997). An Analysis of Nondeductible IRA Contributions and Roth IRA Conversions. Financial Services Review, 6(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(97)90003-2

Issue

Section

New Original Submission