Design considerations for large public sector defined contribution plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(01)00066-XAbstract
The paper identifies differences between private (401 (k)) plans, which have evolved under ERISA and existing public plans, which have not. Examination of model legislation reveals that public plans should largely conform to ERISA going forward and reflect best practices in the private sector. Empirical analysis of equity mutual funds with $1.8 trillion in assets and institutional equity accounts with $98 billion in assets demonstrates efficiencies in separately procured institutional investment, administrative and educational services relative to retail investment products. The analysis points to tension between the duties of trustees and the demands of participants requesting large numbers of retail investment options. © 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restriction.
Author(s) grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. Reusers must acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
In addition, FSR grants to the UGA Libraries a worldwide, non-exclusive license to all content published by the Journal, including metadata, that is necessary to publish, transmit, and index the Journal and to preserve its content over time.
