Dissipation of inheritance windfalls and the case for time-phased transfers: An empirical assessment from HRS data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v34i1.4307Keywords:
Estate Planning, Inheritance, Financial WindfallsAbstract
This study investigates whether inheritances are managed differently than other financial windfalls, testing predictions from Terror Management Theory. Using Health and Retirement Study data (2010–2018), we analyze 3,005 inheritance receipts compared to 1,285 other windfalls (e.g., gifts, lawsuits, insurance settlements). Overall, inheritors were similarly likely (42% vs. 44%) to have spent their entire windfalls when measured about one year later (next survey wave). However, when adjusting for inheritances being nearly three times larger, regressions revealed that inheritors were 24% more likely to immediately spend the entire windfall (OR = 1.24, p < .05). Overall, each inherited dollar increased next-wave net worth by only $0.61. These findings suggest rapid dissipation of bequests is common, perhaps due to an avoidance response to the death-related source of funds. Consequently, advisers and estate planners might better meet client objectives through phased or recurring income distributions instead of lump-sum transfers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cory Thompson, Russell James III

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
This license allows the author to remix, tweak, and build upon the original work non-commercially. The new work(s) must be non-commercial and acknowledge the original work.