Automatic investment plans
realized returns and shortfall probabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v16i3.4889Keywords:
Simulation, Bootstrapping, Dollar cost averagingAbstract
We compare the realized returns and shortfall probabilities of automatic investment plans with those of lump sum investments. We do not assume a cash position and we use bootstrapping techniques to assess the performance differences. Our results indicate that the levels of realized returns from these two strategies are statistically identical for investment horizons from l year to 40 years, regardless of whether we take return autocorrelations or business cycles into account. Automatic investment plans, nevertheless, have higher shortfall probabilities for intermediate horizons. Investors relying on automatic investment plans should consider these probabilities and adjust their asset allocations accordingly.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Academy of Financial Services
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restriction.
Author(s) grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. Reusers must acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
In addition, FSR grants to the UGA Libraries a worldwide, non-exclusive license to all content published by the Journal, including metadata, that is necessary to publish, transmit, and index the Journal and to preserve its content over time.
