Advisor compensation
Which clients know and how do they pay?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v27i3.3396Keywords:
National Financial Capability Study, Financial advisor, Compensation models, Agency theory, Investor SurveyAbstract
Using the 2015 National Financial Capability Study Investor Survey, this study uses agency theory to inform an exploration of characteristics associated with knowing how one’s financial advisor/broker is compensated. This study further examines how individuals who do know the compensation method choose between financial advisors with different compensation models. Proposed changes in the financial advising regulatory landscape, as well as the pending changes to the CFP Board Standards of Professional Conduct, brings greater emphasis on understanding consumers’ advisor compensation preferences. Primary results indicate that clients who place importance on fees, that are more knowledgeable about diversification, and that perform background checks are more likely to know compensation methods. A follow-up analysis reveals distinct differences between individuals that used each model, but also provide some mixed results, indicating that clients may not fully understand the compensation paid to their advisors. Discussion and implications related to these results are provided.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Academy of Financial Services
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restriction.
Author(s) grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. Reusers must acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
In addition, FSR grants to the UGA Libraries a worldwide, non-exclusive license to all content published by the Journal, including metadata, that is necessary to publish, transmit, and index the Journal and to preserve its content over time.
