Tactical asset allocation and presidential elections

Authors

  • James L. Grant JLG Research and University of Massachusetts
  • Emery A. Trahan Finance Group, Northeastern University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v15i2.4853

Keywords:

Calendar investing, Tactical asset allocation, Presidential elections

Abstract

Over the past 75 years, common stocks performed better under Democrats, while U.S. government bonds and Treasury (T) bills performed better under Republicans. Using a mean-variance framework, we find that Democrats provide better risk-reward opportunities for portfolios weighted toward stocks, while Republicans provide better tradeoffs for portfolios weighted toward government bonds and T-bills. More recently, Republicans provide better portfolio opportunities than Democrats for a bond-stock allocation range typical of diversified investors. Moreover, when segmenting the value stock (style) premium by political party, we find that Republicans provide better risk-reward tradeoffs than Democrats for portfolios of value stocks, bonds. and bills.

Downloads

Published

2006-06-30

Issue

Section

New Original Submission

How to Cite

Tactical asset allocation and presidential elections. (2006). Financial Services Review, 15(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v15i2.4853