Variable annuities versus mutual funds
a Monte-Carlo analysis of the options
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(02)00101-4Keywords:
Retirement savings, Taxation, Monte-Carlo simulation, Financial economics, InsuranceAbstract
Mutual funds and variable annuities are similar instruments that differ mainly in their tax treatment. Their relative appeal is the subject of intense debate in the industry. This paper contributes to the literature by quantifying the impact of investment return uncertainty when comparing the two. We focus on the embedded tax options using Monte-Carlo simulations. We conclude that although low-cost variable annuities are superior to low-cost mutual funds over long time horizons, the critical threshold is at least 10 years for typical levels of risk aversion. If, however, one ignores the tax options, the erroneous break-even horizon drops to 5 years. Copyright 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restriction.
Author(s) grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. Reusers must acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this Journal.
Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
In addition, FSR grants to the UGA Libraries a worldwide, non-exclusive license to all content published by the Journal, including metadata, that is necessary to publish, transmit, and index the Journal and to preserve its content over time.
